Commit 674b745e22b3 ("cgroup: remove rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock()
in critical section of spin_lock_irq()") has removed the rcu_read_lock,
which makes the comment out-of-date, so update it.
Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: don't remove the comment, just update it.
---
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
index d8ba2c67910d..f10cef511ffa 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
@@ -2872,9 +2872,11 @@ int cgroup_migrate(struct task_struct *leader, bool threadgroup,
struct task_struct *task;
/*
- * Prevent freeing of tasks while we take a snapshot. Tasks that are
- * already PF_EXITING could be freed from underneath us unless we
- * take an rcu_read_lock.
+ * We should take an rcu_read_lock to prevent freeing of tasks while
+ * taking a snapshot, because tasks that are already PF_EXITING could
+ * be freed when traversing all threads of leader. However rcu_read_lock
+ * which disable preempt is implied by the spin_lock_irq, so no explicit
+ * rcu call here.
*/
spin_lock_irq(&css_set_lock);
task = leader;
--
2.17.1
