On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:17:41AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 04/05/23 08:25, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 09:22:22AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > > > Dietmar Eggemann (2): > > > sched/deadline: Create DL BW alloc, free & check overflow interface > > > cgroup/cpuset: Free DL BW in case can_attach() fails > > > > > > Juri Lelli (4): > > > cgroup/cpuset: Rename functions dealing with DEADLINE accounting > > > sched/cpuset: Bring back cpuset_mutex > > > sched/cpuset: Keep track of SCHED_DEADLINE task in cpusets > > > cgroup/cpuset: Iterate only if DEADLINE tasks are present > > > > > > include/linux/cpuset.h | 12 +- > > > include/linux/sched.h | 4 +- > > > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 4 + > > > kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > > kernel/sched/core.c | 41 +++---- > > > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 67 ++++++++--- > > > kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +- > > > 7 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-) > > > > Aside from a few niggles, these look fine to me. Who were you expecting > > to merge these, tj or me? > > Thanks for reviewing! > > Not entirely sure, it's kind of split, but maybe the cgroup changes are > predominant (cpuset_mutex is probably contributing the most). So, maybe > tj? Assuming this looks good to him as well of course. :) Yeah, they all look sane to me and both Waiman and Peter seem okay with them. If you post an updated version with the minor suggestions applied, I'll route the series through the cgroup tree. Thanks. -- tejun
