Am 14.03.23 um 15:18 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Thread group id (aka pid from userspace point of view) is a more
interesting thing to show as an owner of a DRM fd, so track and show that
instead of the thread id.
In the next patch we will make the owner updated post file descriptor
handover, which will also be tgid based to avoid ping-pong when multiple
threads access the fd.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zack Rusin <zackr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-graphics-maintainer@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Should we push the already reviewed cleanups like this one to
drm-misc-next? That makes sense even without the rest of the
functionality and reduce the amount of patches re-send.
Christian.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gem.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
index d8e683688daa..863cb668e000 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
@@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_gem_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
* Therefore, we need to protect this ->comm access using RCU.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
+ task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
seq_printf(m, "pid %8d command %s:\n", pid_nr(file->pid),
task ? task->comm : "<unknown>");
rcu_read_unlock();
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c
index 4f643a490dc3..4855230ba2c6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int drm_clients_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
seq_printf(m,
"%20s %5s %3s master a %5s %10s\n",
"command",
- "pid",
+ "tgid",
"dev",
"uid",
"magic");
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int drm_clients_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
bool is_current_master = drm_is_current_master(priv);
rcu_read_lock(); /* locks pid_task()->comm */
- task = pid_task(priv->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
+ task = pid_task(priv->pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
uid = task ? __task_cred(task)->euid : GLOBAL_ROOT_UID;
seq_printf(m, "%20s %5d %3d %c %c %5d %10u\n",
task ? task->comm : "<unknown>",
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
index a51ff8cee049..c1018c470047 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ struct drm_file *drm_file_alloc(struct drm_minor *minor)
if (!file)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- file->pid = get_pid(task_pid(current));
+ file->pid = get_pid(task_tgid(current));
file->minor = minor;
/* for compatibility root is always authenticated */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gem.c
index d6baf73a6458..c0da89e16e6f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gem.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static int vmw_debugfs_gem_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
* Therefore, we need to protect this ->comm access using RCU.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
+ task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
seq_printf(m, "pid %8d command %s:\n", pid_nr(file->pid),
task ? task->comm : "<unknown>");
rcu_read_unlock();
