On Tue 21-02-23 16:13:14, Christopher Wong wrote: > Hi Michal, > > Thanks for the quick response! I think we are just trying to > get the same value that was available for us in cgroup v1 > memory.max_usage_in_bytes. I guess this value also is incomplete for > representing the system memory usage. Correct. > Is it due the incompleteness that the memory.peak has been left out in > the root of cgroup v2? I think so but I do not remember 100%. You might want to look into email archives. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
