Re: [PATCH v10 5/9] sched/fair: Take into account latency priority at wakeup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 01:52:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:12:30PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 6c61bde49152..38decae3e156 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -568,6 +568,8 @@ struct sched_entity {
> >  	/* cached value of my_q->h_nr_running */
> >  	unsigned long			runnable_weight;
> >  #endif
> > +	/* preemption offset in ns */
> > +	long				latency_offset;
> 
> I wonder about the type here; does it make sense to have it depend on
> the bitness; that is if s32 is big enough on 32bit then surely it is so
> too on 64bit, and if not, then it should be unconditionally s64.
> 

The cgroup patch has this as 'int'. I'm thinking we ought to be
consistent :-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux