Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: change to return bool for isolate_movable_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/15/2023 11:44 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 06:39:37PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
Now the isolate_movable_page() can only return 0 or -EBUSY, and no users
will care about the negative return value, thus we can convert the
isolate_movable_page() to return a boolean value to make the code more
clear when checking the movable page isolation state.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

A couple of nits below, not worth respinning the patch series for:

diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
index c88b96b48be7..6b252f519c86 100644
--- a/include/linux/migrate.h
+++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ extern int migrate_pages(struct list_head *l, new_page_t new, free_page_t free,
  		unsigned long private, enum migrate_mode mode, int reason,
  		unsigned int *ret_succeeded);
  extern struct page *alloc_migration_target(struct page *page, unsigned long private);
-extern int isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode);
+extern bool isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode);

You can drop the 'extern' here.

+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1668,18 +1668,18 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
  		 * We can skip free pages. And we can deal with pages on
  		 * LRU and non-lru movable pages.
  		 */
-		if (PageLRU(page)) {
+		if (PageLRU(page))
  			isolated = isolate_lru_page(page);
-			ret = isolated ? 0 : -EBUSY;
-		} else
-			ret = isolate_movable_page(page, ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE);
-		if (!ret) { /* Success */
+		else
+			isolated = isolate_movable_page(page, ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE);
+		if (isolated) { /* Success */

I would have dropped the "/* Success */" here.  Before, commenting
"!ret" is quite sensible, but "isolated" seems obviously success to me.

Right. Hope Andrew can help to drop this unnecessary comment:)

Thanks for reviewing.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux