On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 10:17:05AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 11:05:41AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > If we want to get it into the next merge windows, there isn't much time left > > > for linux-next testing. So a lower risk solution is better from that > > > perspective too. > > > > This needs to land for 6.2 to fix the regression. The next merge window is > > too late. That's why I cooked the reverts [1] as an alternative. > > Yeah, I think Waiman meant before the coming merge window. We have at least > one more week so let's try the two patches and see how that goes. We can > always revert if it doesn't work out. I see this has landed in Linus' tree now, so thanks for that! I also tested his branch just to make sure and it all seems fine in my asymmetric environment. Cheers, Will
