Re: Using cgroup membership for resource access control?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 11:42:12AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The flip side is that on vast majority of configurations, cgroup hierarchy
> more or less coincides with process tree which has the benefit of being
> available regardless of cgroups, so in a lot of cases, it can be better to
> just go the traditional way and tie these things to the process tree.

In case it wasn't clear - use the misc controller to restrict which cgroups
can get how many but as for sharing domain, use more traditional mechanisms
whether that's sharing through cloning, fd passing, shared path with perm
checks or whatever.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux