On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 03:46:02PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > > > I will work on a patchset to do that as a counter offer. > > We will need a small and simple patch for /urgent, or I will need to > > revert all your patches -- your call. > > > > I also don't tihnk you fully appreciate the ramifications of > > task_cpu_possible_mask(), cpuset currently gets that quite wrong. > > OK, I don't realize the urgency of that. If it is that urgent, I will have > no objection to get it in for now. We can improve it later on. So are you > planning to get it into the current 6.2 rc or 6.3? > > Tejun, are you OK with that as you are the cgroup maintainer? Yeah, gotta fix the regression but is there currently a solution which fixes the regression but doesn't further break other stuff? Thanks. -- tejun
