On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 10:57:06 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think it's a bit premature to revert at this stage. Possibly we can > > get to the desired end state by modifying the existing code. Possibly > > we can get to the desired end state by reverting this and by adding > > something new. > > Sure if we can converge to a proper implementation during the rc phase > then it would be ok. I cannot speak for others but at least for me > upcoming 2 weeks would be mostly offline so I cannot really contribute > much. A revert would be much more easier from the coordination POV IMHO. > > Also I do not think there is any strong reason to rush this in. I do not > really see any major problems to have this extension in 6.2 I'll queue the revert in mm-unstable with a plan to merge it upstream around the -rc5 timeframe if there hasn't been resolution. Please check Mina's issues with this revert's current changelog and perhaps send along a revised one.
