On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 10:05 PM Muchun Song <muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 2, 2022, at 06:10, Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:32 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 06:03:27PM -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> >>> index 7b8e8e43806b..23fc5b523764 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> >>> @@ -6735,7 +6735,8 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> >>> unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> >>> unsigned long nr_pages,
> >>> gfp_t gfp_mask,
> >>> - unsigned int reclaim_options)
> >>> + unsigned int reclaim_options,
> >>> + nodemask_t nodemask)
> >>
> >> Can you please make this parameter a nodemask_t* and pass NULL instead
> >> of NODE_MASK_ALL?
> >
> > Thank you very much for the review. I sure can in the next version. To
> > be honest I thought about that and made the parameter nodemask_t
> > because I thought the call sites would be more readable. I.e. this:
> >
> > try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
> > MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NODE_MASK_ALL);
>
> nodemask_t is an array, which can be large depending on CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT.
> I don't think passing a big array is an efficient way. So I agree with Shakeel.
>
Ah, yes, I think the nodemask_t ends up compiling to something like:
typedef struct {
unsigned long name[BITS_TO_LONGS(MAX_NUMNODES)]
} nodemask_t;
If it was an array it would be passed by reference anway, but I think
if it is a struct containing an array the array will get copied
indeed. Sure, I will fix in the next version.
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > Would be more readable than this:
> >
> > try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
> > MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL);
> >
> > But the tradeoff is that the callers need include/linux/nodemask.h.
> > But yes I can fix in the next version.
> >
>
