On 11/28/22 12:07 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:00:55PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 11/28/22 11:56 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 11/27/22 19:30, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>> Fixes: 951d1e94801f ("blk-cgroup: Flush stats at blkgs destruction path")
>>>
>>> Has Jens' for-next branch perhaps been rebased? I see the following commit ID for that patch:
>>>
>>> dae590a6c96c ("blk-cgroup: Flush stats at blkgs destruction path")
>>
>> I don't know that sha is from, not from me. for-6.2/block has not been
>> rebased, for-next gets rebased whenever I need to do so as linux-next is
>> continually rebased anyway. But the sha for that commit would not change
>> as a result.
>>
>> I don't even have that sha in my tree, so...
>
> $ git tag --contains dae590a6c96c
> next-20221117
> next-20221118
> next-20221121
> next-20221122
> next-20221123
> next-20221124
> next-20221125
> next-20221128
That is the right sha, I'm talking about the fixes line in the
patch you're replying to:
Fixes: 951d1e94801f ("blk-cgroup: Flush stats at blkgs destruction path")
which is certainly not from my tree.
--
Jens Axboe
