On 11/25/22 02:51, haifeng.xu wrote:
cpuset_task_status_allowed just shows mems_allowed status, so
rename it to task_mems_allowed. Moreover, it's only used in
proc_pid_status, so move it to fs/proc/array.c. There is no
intentional function change.
Signed-off-by: haifeng.xu <haifeng.xu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/proc/array.c | 13 +++++++++++--
include/linux/cpuset.h | 7 -------
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 9 ---------
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
index 49283b8103c7..e6cdef8387e6 100644
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/fdtable.h>
#include <linux/times.h>
-#include <linux/cpuset.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/delayacct.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
@@ -413,6 +412,16 @@ static void task_cpus_allowed(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
cpumask_pr_args(&task->cpus_mask));
}
+static void task_mems_allowed(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS
+ seq_printf(m, "Mems_allowed:\t%*pb\n",
+ nodemask_pr_args(&task->mems_allowed));
+ seq_printf(m, "Mems_allowed_list:\t%*pbl\n",
+ nodemask_pr_args(&task->mems_allowed));
+#endif
+}
+
static inline void task_core_dumping(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
{
seq_put_decimal_ull(m, "CoreDumping:\t", !!task->signal->core_state);
@@ -449,7 +458,7 @@ int proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
task_cap(m, task);
task_seccomp(m, task);
task_cpus_allowed(m, task);
- cpuset_task_status_allowed(m, task);
+ task_mems_allowed(m, task);
task_context_switch_counts(m, task);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index d58e0476ee8e..30b91116dd2f 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -112,8 +112,6 @@ extern int cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(const struct task_struct *tsk1,
extern int cpuset_memory_pressure_enabled;
extern void __cpuset_memory_pressure_bump(void);
-extern void cpuset_task_status_allowed(struct seq_file *m,
- struct task_struct *task);
extern int proc_cpuset_show(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *tsk);
@@ -246,11 +244,6 @@ static inline int cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(const struct task_struct *tsk1,
static inline void cpuset_memory_pressure_bump(void) {}
-static inline void cpuset_task_status_allowed(struct seq_file *m,
- struct task_struct *task)
-{
-}
-
static inline int cpuset_mem_spread_node(void)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 589827ccda8b..5798d4231662 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -4045,12 +4045,3 @@ int proc_cpuset_show(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
return retval;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PROC_PID_CPUSET */
-
-/* Display task mems_allowed in /proc/<pid>/status file. */
-void cpuset_task_status_allowed(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
-{
- seq_printf(m, "Mems_allowed:\t%*pb\n",
- nodemask_pr_args(&task->mems_allowed));
- seq_printf(m, "Mems_allowed_list:\t%*pbl\n",
- nodemask_pr_args(&task->mems_allowed));
-}
It is just a minor cleanup. I think that is OK.
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>