[PATCH v2 5/5] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is no iocg_pd_init function. The pd_alloc_fn function pointer of
iocost policy is set with ioc_pd_init. Just correct it.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-iocost.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index 761295ed9c5a..96c1571a8a1d 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -2880,7 +2880,7 @@ static int blk_iocost_init(struct gendisk *disk)
 	spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock);
 
 	/*
-	 * rqos must be added before activation to allow iocg_pd_init() to
+	 * rqos must be added before activation to allow ioc_pd_init() to
 	 * lookup the ioc from q. This means that the rqos methods may get
 	 * called before policy activation completion, can't assume that the
 	 * target bio has an iocg associated and need to test for NULL iocg.
-- 
2.30.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux