On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:27:09AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 9:18 AM Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:13:09AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > Hmm. We discussed this option already. We definitely don't want > > > to introduce an uapi knob that will allow anyone to skip memcg > > > accounting today and in the future. > > > > cgroup.memory boot parameter is how memcg provides last-resort workarounds > > for this sort of problems / regressions while they're being addressed. It's > > not a dynamically changeable or programmable thing. Just a boot time > > opt-out. That said, if you don't want it, you don't want it. > > ahh. boot param. > Are you suggesting a global off switch ? Like nosocket and nokmem. > That would be a different story. > Need to think more about it. It could be ok. Yeah, nobpf or sth like that. An equivalent cgroup.memory parameter. Thanks. -- tejun
