On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:30:28PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 03:34:46PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote: > > Currrent /proc/cgroup output is like: > > > > #subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled > > cpuset 6 1 1 > > cpu 4 7 1 > > cpuacct 4 7 1 > > blkio 8 7 1 > > memory 9 7 1 > > ... > > > > Add some indentation to make it more readable without any functional > > change: > > So, this has been suggested a couple times before and I fully agree that the > file is really ugly. In the past, we didn't pull the trigger on it for two > reasons - 1. It is user-visible functional change in that it can break > really dumb parsers 2. the file is only useful for cgroup1 which has been in > mostly maintenance mode for many years now. I don't feel that strongly > either way but still kinda lean towards just leaving it as-is. Ok, makes sense to me. Thanks for the explaination! Thanks, Feng > Thanks. > > -- > tejun
