On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:25:52PM +0800, Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Your means is that the problem should be fixed by [1]+[2]'s revert ? I understood that was already the combination you had tested. You write in [T] that [1] alone causes (another) deadlock and therefore the revert of [2] was suggested. > I just tested the case which reverted the [2]. Need I test with [1] and [2]? It'd be better (unless you haven't already :-), my reasoning is for the [1]+[2] combo. Thanks, Michal [T] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAB8ipk_gCLtvEahsp2DvPJf4NxRsM8WCYmmH=yTd7zQE+81_Yg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
