On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 5:51 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 7/10/22 5:26 PM, Yonghong Song wrote: [...] > > BTW, CI also reported the test failure. > https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/3284 > > For example, with gcc built kernel, > https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/7272407890?check_suite_focus=true > > The error: > > get_cgroup_vmscan_delay:PASS:cgroup_id 0 nsec > get_cgroup_vmscan_delay:PASS:vmscan_reading 0 nsec > check_vmscan_stats:FAIL:child1_vmscan unexpected child1_vmscan: > actual 28390910 != expected 28390909 > check_vmscan_stats:FAIL:child2_vmscan unexpected child2_vmscan: > actual 0 != expected -2 > check_vmscan_stats:PASS:test_vmscan 0 nsec > check_vmscan_stats:PASS:root_vmscan 0 nsec > Yonghong, I noticed that the test only failed on test_progs-no_alu32, not test_progs. test_progs passed. I believe Yosry and I have only tested on test_progs. I tried building and running the no_alu32 version, but so far, not able to run test_progs-no_alu32. Whenever I ran test_progs-no_alu32, it exits without any message. Do you have any clue what could be wrong? > > [...]
