On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:48 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On 6/10/22 12:44 PM, Yosry Ahmed wrote: > > From: Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > In bpf_seq_read, seq->op->next() could return an ERR and jump to > > the label stop. However, the existing code in stop does not handle > > the case when p (returned from next()) is an ERR. Adds the handling > > of ERR of p by converting p into an error and jumping to done. > > > > Because all the current implementations do not have a case that > > returns ERR from next(), so this patch doesn't have behavior changes > > right now. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> Yonghong, do you want to get this change in now, or you want to wait for the whole patchset? This fix is straightforward and independent of other parts. Yosry and I can rebase.
