On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 08:37:58AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 03:57:17PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 07:36:24PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 02:05:41PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > > - memcg_reparent_list_lrus(memcg, parent);
> > > > + memcg_reparent_list_lrus(memcg, parent_mem_cgroup(memcg));
> > > We effectively dropped this:
> > > if (!parent)
> > > parent = root_mem_cgroup;
> > > Is it safe? (assuming v1 non-hierarchical mode, it's usually when all
> > > is getting complicated)
>
> Yes, it's correct. But it's a quiet, incidental cleanup, so I can see
> why it's confusing. It might be better to split the dead code removal
> into a separate patch - with the following in the changelog ;):
>
Well, I can split the dead code removal into a separate patch. :-)
Thanks.
> > Since no-hierarchy mode is deprecated after commit bef8620cd8e0
> > ("mm: memcg: deprecate the non-hierarchical mode"), so
> > parent_mem_cgroup() cannot return a NULL except root memcg,
> > however, root memcg will not be offline, so it is safe. Right?
>
