Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests: memcg: Fix compilation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx>, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests: memcg: Fix compilation
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 19:11:01 +0500
Cc: usama.anjum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220518161859.21565-2-mkoutny@suse.com>
References: <20220518161859.21565-1-mkoutny@suse.com> <20220518161859.21565-2-mkoutny@suse.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0

On 5/18/22 9:18 PM, Michal Koutný wrote:
> This fixes mis-applied changes from commit 72b1e03aa725 ("cgroup:
> account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()").
Shouldn't the Fixes tag be added here and in 2/5 patch?

-- 
Muhammad Usama Anjum

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests: memcg: Fix compilation
  - From: Michal Koutný

References:
- [no subject]
  - From: Michal Koutný
- [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests: memcg: Fix compilation
  - From: Michal Koutný

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -next v5 0/3] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion
Next by Date: [PATCH mm v2 0/9] memcg: accounting for objects allocated by mkdir cgroup
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests: memcg: Fix compilation
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests: memcg: Fix compilation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [Monitors]

Powered by Linux