Just make the code a litter cleaner by removing the unnecessary
variable 'sd'.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
---
block/bfq-wf2q.c | 14 +++++---------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
index 15b97687493a..da189c732376 100644
--- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
+++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
@@ -1085,12 +1085,12 @@ static void __bfq_requeue_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity)
}
static void __bfq_activate_requeue_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,
- struct bfq_sched_data *sd,
bool non_blocking_wait_rq)
{
struct bfq_service_tree *st = bfq_entity_service_tree(entity);
- if (sd->in_service_entity == entity || entity->tree == &st->active)
+ if (entity->sched_data->in_service_entity == entity ||
+ entity->tree == &st->active)
/*
* in service or already queued on the active tree,
* requeue or reposition
@@ -1122,14 +1122,10 @@ static void bfq_activate_requeue_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,
bool non_blocking_wait_rq,
bool requeue, bool expiration)
{
- struct bfq_sched_data *sd;
-
for_each_entity(entity) {
- sd = entity->sched_data;
- __bfq_activate_requeue_entity(entity, sd, non_blocking_wait_rq);
-
- if (!bfq_update_next_in_service(sd, entity, expiration) &&
- !requeue)
+ __bfq_activate_requeue_entity(entity, non_blocking_wait_rq);
+ if (!bfq_update_next_in_service(entity->sched_data, entity,
+ expiration) && !requeue)
break;
}
}
--
2.31.1
