On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 06:51:55PM +0300, Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > diff --git a/fs/kernfs/mount.c b/fs/kernfs/mount.c > index cfa79715fc1a..40e896c7c86b 100644 > --- a/fs/kernfs/mount.c > +++ b/fs/kernfs/mount.c > @@ -391,10 +391,12 @@ void __init kernfs_init(void) > { > kernfs_node_cache = kmem_cache_create("kernfs_node_cache", > sizeof(struct kernfs_node), > - 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL); > + 0, SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_ACCOUNT, > + NULL); > > /* Creates slab cache for kernfs inode attributes */ > kernfs_iattrs_cache = kmem_cache_create("kernfs_iattrs_cache", > sizeof(struct kernfs_iattrs), > - 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL); > + 0, SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_ACCOUNT, > + NULL); IIUC your stats report, struct kernfs_iattrs is mere 88B (per kernfs_node), when considering attributes, I actually thought of something like: --- a/fs/xattr.c +++ b/fs/xattr.c @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ struct simple_xattr *simple_xattr_alloc(const void *value, size_t size) if (len < sizeof(*new_xattr)) return NULL; - new_xattr = kvmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); + new_xattr = kvmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); if (!new_xattr) return NULL; Again, I'd split the patch into two: kernfs_node and kernfs_iattrs+simple_xattr for easier bisecting. Thanks, Michal