Hi Michal, On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 07:04:10PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote: > Are the Roman's patches merged anywhere? (I ran into some issues when I > was rebasing your (David's) series on top of master.) I'd like to put > all sensible patches in one series or stack on existing branch (if > there's any). Roman's patches are present on master on the linux-mm tree. See b7dbfd6553d..a131b1ed12c6. > For possible v3 of this series, I did: > - dropped the patch that allows non-zero memory.events:low for a sibling with > memory.low=0 when mounted with memory_recursiveprot (the case needs more > discussion), Ack, and thanks for keeping us steered in the right direction here. I don't see this in the patch set you linked, but I agree this commit should be reverted and the reclaim logic instead fixed. > - added few more cleanups, convenience for debugging, Are you referring to the FAIL() macro you added? I would love to Ack that, but unfortunately checkpatch.pl will probably yell at you for having a goto in that macro, per the point about avoiding macros that affect control flow [0]. I tried to do the same thing when sending out my patch set and had to revert it before sending it to upstream. Thanks, David [0] https://github.com/Werkov/linux/commit/a076339cc4825af2f22f58c1347a572b104b8221
