Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] cgroup/cpuset: Allow no-task partition to have empty cpuset.cpus.effective

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/3/22 13:54, Phil Auld wrote:
Hi Waiman

On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 12:21:44PM -0400 Waiman Long wrote:
Currently, a partition root cannot have empty "cpuset.cpus.effective".
As a result, a parent partition root cannot distribute out all its CPUs
  to child partitions with no CPUs left. However in most cases, there
shouldn't be any tasks associated with intermediate nodes of the default
  hierarchy. So the current rule is too restrictive and can waste valuable
  CPU resource.

To address this issue, we are now allowing a partition to have empty
"cpuset.cpus.effective" as long as it has no task. Therefore, a parent
partition with no task can now have all its CPUs distributed out to its
child partitions. The top cpuset always have some house-keeping tasks
running and so its list of effective cpu can't never be empty.
s/never/ever/
It is a double negative. I think I will just remove "never".
Once a partition with empty "cpuset.cpus.effective" is formed, no
new task can be moved into it until "cpuset.cpus.effective" becomes
non-empty.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
  1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index d156a39d7a08..7d9abd50a1b9 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -412,6 +412,41 @@ static inline bool is_in_v2_mode(void)
  	      (cpuset_cgrp_subsys.root->flags & CGRP_ROOT_CPUSET_V2_MODE);
  }
+/**
+ * partition_is_populated - check if partition has tasks
+ * @cs: partition root to be checked
+ * @excluded_child: a child cpuset to be excluded in task checking
+ * Return: true if there are tasks, false otherwise
+ *
+ * It is assumed that @cs is a valid partition root. @excluded_child should
+ * be non-NULL when this cpuset is going to become a partition itself.
+ */
+static inline bool partition_is_populated(struct cpuset *cs,
+					  struct cpuset *excluded_child)
+{
+	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
+	struct cpuset *child;
+
+	if (cs->css.cgroup->nr_populated_csets)
+		return true;
+	if (!excluded_child && !cs->nr_subparts_cpus)
+		return cgroup_is_populated(cs->css.cgroup);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	cpuset_for_each_child(child, css, cs) {
+		if (child == excluded_child)
+			continue;
+		if (is_partition_valid(child))
+			continue;
+		if (cgroup_is_populated(child->css.cgroup)) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			return true;
+		}
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return false;
+}
+
  /*
   * Return in pmask the portion of a task's cpusets's cpus_allowed that
   * are online and are capable of running the task.  If none are found,
@@ -1252,22 +1287,25 @@ static int update_parent_subparts_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
  	if ((cmd != partcmd_update) && css_has_online_children(&cs->css))
  		return -EBUSY;
- /*
-	 * Enabling partition root is not allowed if not all the CPUs
-	 * can be granted from parent's effective_cpus or at least one
-	 * CPU will be left after that.
-	 */
-	if ((cmd == partcmd_enable) &&
-	   (!cpumask_subset(cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus) ||
-	     cpumask_equal(cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus)))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	/*
-	 * A cpumask update cannot make parent's effective_cpus become empty.
-	 */
  	adding = deleting = false;
  	old_prs = new_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
  	if (cmd == partcmd_enable) {
+		/*
+		 * Enabling partition root is not allowed if not all the CPUs
+		 * can be granted from parent's effective_cpus.
+		 */
+		if (!cpumask_subset(cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		/*
+		 * A parent can be left with no CPU as long as there is no
+		 * task directly associated with the parent partition. For
+		 * such a parent, no new task can be moved into it.
+		 */
+		if (partition_is_populated(parent, cs) &&
+		    cpumask_equal(cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
You might consider switching these around to check the cpumasks first.
Good point, partition_is_populated() is more expensive.


  		cpumask_copy(tmp->addmask, cs->cpus_allowed);
  		adding = true;
  	} else if (cmd == partcmd_disable) {
@@ -1289,9 +1327,10 @@ static int update_parent_subparts_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
  		adding = cpumask_andnot(tmp->addmask, tmp->addmask,
  					parent->subparts_cpus);
  		/*
-		 * Return error if the new effective_cpus could become empty.
+		 * Return error if the new effective_cpus could become empty
+		 * and there are tasks in the parent.
  		 */
-		if (adding &&
+		if (adding && partition_is_populated(parent, cs) &&
  		    cpumask_equal(parent->effective_cpus, tmp->addmask)) {
Same.
Thanks,
Longman




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux