Re: [PATCH -next v4 1/3] block, bfq: record how many queues are busy in bfq_group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



在 2022/04/28 19:18, Jan Kara 写道:
On Thu 28-04-22 19:19:05, Yu Kuai wrote:
Prepare to refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'.

Add a counter 'busy_queues' in bfq_group, and update it in
bfq_add/del_bfqq_busy().

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Just two nits below:

--- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
+++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
@@ -218,6 +218,16 @@ static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity)
  	return false;
  }
+static void bfq_add_busy_queues(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
+{
+	bfqq_group(bfqq)->busy_queues++;
+}
+
+static void bfq_dec_busy_queues(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
+{
+	bfqq_group(bfqq)->busy_queues--;
+}
+

An opposite from "decrement" is "increment", not "add". So
bfq_add_busy_queues() should be bfq_inc_busy_queues().

You are right

@@ -230,6 +240,14 @@ static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity)
  	return true;
  }
+static void bfq_add_busy_queues(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
+{
+}
+
+static void bfq_add_busy_queues(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
+{
+}
+

You have two times the same function here and you miss the other one...

oops, I forgot to compile without CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED...

Thanks a lot to spolt this.
Kuai

								Honza




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux