Hi Tejun, On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 12:21:18PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > * Can you please repost w/ Ingo and Peterz cc'd? Will do, I'll cc them on v2. > * Maybe cpucg instead of cgcpu? Agreed, that seems more intuitive. I'll change it in v2. > * Single level testing is great but extending the case to cover deeper > nesting level would be great. ie. a test case with multi level tree w/ > both under and over provisioned parts in the tree. This sounds like a great idea. I have another patch set that I was planning to send out which adds a few more testcases. I can include some testcases in that set which validate more complicated nesting setups. Thanks, David
