On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 02:44:24PM -0700, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Does it mean that in the following configuration: > `parent .low=50M > ` s1 .low=0M .current=50M > ` s2 .low=0M .current=50M > there will be no memory.events::low at all? (assuming the recursive thing is on) True, no memory.events:low among siblings. Number of memory.events:low in the parent depends on how much has to be reclaimed (>50M means carving into parent's protection, hence it'll be counted). This is a quantitative change in the events reporting (point 1 of RFCness), my understanding is that the potential events due to recursive surplus protection carry no new information regarding configured memory.low. Michal
