On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 02:23:07PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > It was found that a number of offlined memcgs were not freed because > they were pinned by some charged pages that were present. Even "echo > 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" wasn't able to free those pages. These > offlined but not freed memcgs tend to increase in number over time with > the side effect that percpu memory consumption as shown in /proc/meminfo > also increases over time. > > In order to find out more information about those pages that pin > offlined memcgs, the page_owner feature is extended to print memory > cgroup information especially whether the cgroup is offlined or not. > > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/page_owner.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c > index 28dac73e0542..a471c74c7fe0 100644 > --- a/mm/page_owner.c > +++ b/mm/page_owner.c > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > #include <linux/migrate.h> > #include <linux/stackdepot.h> > #include <linux/seq_file.h> > +#include <linux/memcontrol.h> > #include <linux/sched/clock.h> > > #include "internal.h" > @@ -325,6 +326,42 @@ void pagetypeinfo_showmixedcount_print(struct seq_file *m, > seq_putc(m, '\n'); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG > +/* > + * Looking for memcg information and print it out > + */ > +static inline void print_page_owner_memcg(char *kbuf, size_t count, int *pret, > + struct page *page) > +{ > + unsigned long memcg_data = READ_ONCE(page->memcg_data); > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg; > + bool onlined; > + char name[80]; > + > + if (!memcg_data) > + return; > + > + if (memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS) > + *pret += scnprintf(kbuf + *pret, count - *pret, > + "Slab cache page\n"); Don't we need to check for overflow here? > + > + memcg = page_memcg_check(page); > + if (!memcg) > + return; > + > + onlined = (memcg->css.flags & CSS_ONLINE); > + cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup, name, sizeof(name)); > + *pret += scnprintf(kbuf + *pret, count - *pret, > + "Charged %sto %smemcg %s\n", > + PageMemcgKmem(page) ? "(via objcg) " : "", > + onlined ? "" : "offlined ", > + name); Ditto > +} > +#else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */ > +static inline void print_page_owner_memcg(char *kbuf, size_t count, int *pret, > + struct page *page) { } I think #ifdef inside the print_page_owner_memcg() functions will be simpler and clearer. > +#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */ > + > static ssize_t > print_page_owner(char __user *buf, size_t count, unsigned long pfn, > struct page *page, struct page_owner *page_owner, > @@ -365,6 +402,8 @@ print_page_owner(char __user *buf, size_t count, unsigned long pfn, > migrate_reason_names[page_owner->last_migrate_reason]); > } > > + print_page_owner_memcg(kbuf, count, &ret, page); > + ret can go over count here. Why not make print_page_owner_memcg() an int so that the call will be consistent with other calls in print_page_owner(): ret += print_page_owner_memcg(kbuf, count, page); if (ret >= count) goto err; > ret += snprintf(kbuf + ret, count - ret, "\n"); > if (ret >= count) > goto err; > -- > 2.27.0 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.