Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/memcg: use NUMA_NO_NODE to indicate allocation from unspecified node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 01:02:59AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> Instead of use "-1", let's use NUMA_NO_NODE for consistency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 2ed5f2a0879d..11715f7323c0 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5054,7 +5054,7 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_node_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int node)
>  	 *       function.
>  	 */
>  	if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
> -		tmp = -1;
> +		tmp = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>  	pn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*pn), GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
>  	if (!pn)
>  		return 1;
> -- 
> 2.33.1
> 
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux