On 2021-12-15 19:44:00 [+0100], Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 15-12-21 18:13:40, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > Okay. What do I gain by doing this / how do I test this? Is running > > tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_*mem* sufficient to test all corner > > cases here? > > I am not fully aware of all the tests but my point is that if the soft > limit is not configured then there are no soft limit tree manipulations > ever happening and therefore the code is effectivelly dead. Is this > sufficient for the RT patchset to ignore the RT incompatible parts? So if that softlimit is not essential and makes things easier by simply disabling it, yes I could try that. I will keep that in mind. Sebastian
