Re: [RESEND PATCH RFC] cgroup: support numabalancing disable in cgroup level

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: wanghonglei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH RFC] cgroup: support numabalancing disable in cgroup level
From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:50:28 +0800
Cc: bristot@xxxxxxxxxx, bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx, jameshongleiwang@xxxxxxx, juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lizefan.x@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20211213150506.61780-1-wanghonglei@didichuxing.com>
References: <20211213150506.61780-1-wanghonglei@didichuxing.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0

Hi,
How about my per-process numa balancning patch;)

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211206024530.11336-1-ligang.bdlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
--
Thanks
Gang Li

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RESEND PATCH RFC] cgroup: support numabalancing disable in cgroup level
  - From: Honglei Wang

References:
- [RESEND PATCH RFC] cgroup: support numabalancing disable in cgroup level
  - From: Honglei Wang

Prev by Date: Re: Use after free with BFQ and cgroups
Next by Date: Re: [RESEND PATCH RFC] cgroup: support numabalancing disable in cgroup level
Previous by thread: Re: [RESEND PATCH RFC] cgroup: support numabalancing disable in cgroup level
Next by thread: Re: [RESEND PATCH RFC] cgroup: support numabalancing disable in cgroup level
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [Monitors]

Powered by Linux