Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/15/21 15:11, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 08:31:22PM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote:
Now to the constraints and partition setups. I think it's useful to have
a model with which the implementation can be compared with.
I tried to condense some "simple rules" from the descriptions you posted
in v8 plus your response to my remarks in v7 [2]. These should only be
the "validity conditions", not "transition conditions".
FWIW, my opinion is pretty much in line with Michal's in this regard. Other
than that, everything looks pretty good to me.

Yes, I am going to streamline the documentation as suggested to make it easier to understand.

Coding-wise, do you have other changes you want me to make?

Thanks,
Longman




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux