On 2021/11/02 10:07, Yu Kuai wrote:
friendly ping...
If blk_queue_enter() failed due to queue is dying, the
blkdev_put_no_open() is needed because blkcg_conf_open_bdev() succeeded.
Fixes: 0c9d338c8443 ("blk-cgroup: synchronize blkg creation against policy deactivation")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-cgroup.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index 88b1fce90520..663aabfeba18 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
*/
ret = blk_queue_enter(q, 0);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto fail;
rcu_read_lock();
spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
@@ -676,13 +676,13 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
new_blkg = blkg_alloc(pos, q, GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!new_blkg)) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto fail;
+ goto fail_exit_queue;
}
if (radix_tree_preload(GFP_KERNEL)) {
blkg_free(new_blkg);
ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto fail;
+ goto fail_exit_queue;
}
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -722,9 +722,10 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
fail_unlock:
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
+fail_exit_queue:
+ blk_queue_exit(q);
fail:
blkdev_put_no_open(bdev);
- blk_queue_exit(q);
/*
* If queue was bypassing, we should retry. Do so after a
* short msleep(). It isn't strictly necessary but queue
