On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:21 AM Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > What do you think about that approach? While the proposed patch looks fine, > it kinda bothers me that it's a very partial optimization - ie. if flush > frequency is high enough for this to matter, that for_each_possible_cpu() > scanning loop really isn't appropriate. > Makes sense. I will take a stab at that.
