On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 01:20:37PM +0800, brookxu <brookxu.cn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah, this is more reasonable. But there is still one question, whether we > need to be consistent with other cgroup subsystems, events and events.local > under v1 should not support hierarchy？ My take is that it's acceptable to present the v2-like files in v1 too for the sake of simplicity since: - this is not used yet, - the v1 is less conventional and - the presence of events.local would cater even to cases with tasks in inner nodes. It'd be good to have Tejun's insight on this too. Michal
