Hello, On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 08:43:22PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote: > @@ -7112,11 +7113,9 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data) > > snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "iou-sqp-%d", sqd->task_pid); > set_task_comm(current, buf); > + if (sqd->sq_cpu != -1 && test_cpu_in_current_cpuset(sqd->sq_cpu)) > set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(sqd->sq_cpu)); > + Would it make sense to just test whether set_cpus_allowed_ptr() succeeded afterwards? > @@ -8310,8 +8309,10 @@ static int io_sq_offload_create(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, > int cpu = p->sq_thread_cpu; > > ret = -EINVAL; > - if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu)) > + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu) || > + !test_cpu_in_current_cpuset(cpu)) > goto err_sqpoll; > + Failing operations on transient conditions like this may be confusing. Let's ignore cpuset for now. CPU hotplug is sometimes driven automatically for power saving purposes, so failing operation based on whether a cpu is online means that the success or failure of the operation can seem arbitrary. If the operation takes place while the cpu happens to be online, it succeeds and the thread gets unbound and rebound automatically as the cpu goes offline and online. If the operation takes place while the cpu happens to be offline, the operation fails. I don't know what the intended behavior here should be and we haven't been pretty bad at defining reasonable behavior around cpu hotplug, so it'd probably be worthwhile to consider what the behavior should be. Thanks. -- tejun
