Hello, On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote: > However, the non-hierarchical failcnt interface looks like v1ism to me > (I think new features should come with v2 first in mind). > What about exposing this in misc.events file with max.$res_name entries? Ah yeah, good point. misc.events sounds like a good spot to put these. > Or if the hierarchical reporting is unnecessary now, there can be just > misc.events.local for starters. I'd prefer to stick with hierarchical counting as the first step at least. > (That reminds me the forgotten pids.events[.local] rework [1], oops.) > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191128172612.10259-1-mkoutny@xxxxxxxx/#t I think both counters are useful - the number of failures due to this type of limit in this subhierarchy, and the number of failures caused by this particular limit in this subhierarchy. It's a pretty subtle difference to encapsulate in a counter name tho. Thanks. -- tejun
