Thanks for your time. Tejun Heo wrote on 2021/7/28 11:38 下午: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 05:47:05PM +0800, brookxu wrote: >> But considering stability issues(k8s), There are still many production environments use >> cgroup v1 without kmem. If kmem is enabled, due to the relatively large granularity >> of kmem, this feature can also prevent the abnormal open behavior from making the entire >> container unavailable? but I currently do not have this scenario. > > Now we are repeating the same points. This simply doesn't justify adding a > user-facing feature that we have to maintain for eternity. Ok, thanks you for your patient reply. > Thanks. >
