Hello, On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 05:24:12PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > The update_flag() is called with one flag bit change and without change > in the various cpumasks in the cpuset. Moreover, not all changes in the > flag bits are validated in validate_change(). In particular, the load > balance flag and the two spread flags are not checked there. So there > is no point in calling validate_change() if those flag bits change. The fact that it's escaping validation conditionally from caller side is bothersome given that the idea is to have self-contained verifier to ensure correctness. I'd prefer to make the validation more complete and optimized (ie. detect or keep track of what changed) if really necessary rather than escaping partially because certain conditions aren't checked. Thanks. -- tejun
