Re: [PATCH v4] sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 12:23:14PM +0200, Odin Ugedal <odin@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> @@ -4719,8 +4738,8 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
>  		cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time += rq_clock_task(rq) -
>  					     cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task;
>  
> -		/* Add cfs_rq with already running entity in the list */
> -		if (cfs_rq->nr_running >= 1)
> +		/* Add cfs_rq with load or one or more already running entities to the list */
> +		if (!cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq) || cfs_rq->nr_running)
>  			list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>  	}

Can there be a decayed cfs_rq with positive nr_running?
I.e. can the condition be simplified to just the decayed check?

(I'm looking at account_entity_enqueue() but I don't know if an entity's
weight can be zero in some singular cases.)

Thanks,
Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux