On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:33 PM Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 09:54:21AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > The cond_resched() in cgroup_rstat_flush_locked() matches its appearence in > > your post [1]. So does unbound IMHO. > > Ah yeah, this either needs CPU_INTENSIVE or UNBOUND, prolly the latter is > better. > I will change the next version to the system_unbound_wq.
