Hello, On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 03:24:38PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote: > I agree that switching to the nearest ancestor makes sense. If I remember > correctly, I was doing this in v1 (or at least planned to do), but then > switched to zeroing the pointer and then to bdi's wb. > > I fixed it in v8 and pushed it here: https://github.com/rgushchin/linux/tree/cgwb.8 . > I'll wait a bit for Jan's and others feedback and will post v8 on Monday. > Hopefully, it will be the final version. Sounds great. > Btw, how are such patches usually routed? Through Jens's tree? I think the past writeback patches went through -mm. Thanks. -- tejun
