Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] memcg: accounting for fib6_nodes cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:32:07 -0700 Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:24:31PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:09 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> > > Sorry for a random question, I didn't get the cover letter.
> > >
> > > What's the overhead of adding SLAB_ACCOUNT?
> > 
> > The potential overhead is for MEMCG users where we need to
> > charge/account each allocation from SLAB_ACCOUNT kmem caches. However
> > charging is done in batches, so the cost is amortized. If there is a
> > concern about a specific workload then it would be good to see the
> > impact of this patch for that workload.
> >   
> > > Please make sure you CC netdev on series which may impact networking.  
> 
> In general the overhead is not that big, so I don't think we should argue
> too much about every new case where we want to enable the accounting and
> rather focus on those few examples (if any?) where it actually hurts
> the performance in a meaningful way.

Ack, no serious concerns about this particular case.

I was expecting you'd have micro benchmark numbers handy so I was
curious to learn what they are, but that appears not to be the case.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux