On 2/22/21 12:41 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> >> >> Ah, that's true. The added check for soft_limit_excess is not needed. >> >> Do you think it is still a good idea to add patch 3 to >> restrict the uncharge update in page batch of the same node and cgroup? > > I would rather drop it. The less the soft limit reclaim code is spread > around the better. > Let's drop patch 3 then. I find patch 2 is the most critical one in this series. Without that patch some cgroups exceeds the soft limit excess very badly. Tim
