Re: [PATCH v20 02/20] mm/memcg: bail early from swap accounting if memcg disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2020/10/29 下午9:46, Johannes Weiner 写道:
>>  ? release_pages+0x1ae/0x410
>>  shmem_alloc_and_acct_page+0x77/0x1c0
>>  shmem_getpage_gfp+0x162/0x910
>>  shmem_fault+0x74/0x210
>>  ? filemap_map_pages+0x29c/0x410
>>  __do_fault+0x37/0x190
>>  handle_mm_fault+0x120a/0x1770
>>  exc_page_fault+0x251/0x450
>>  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
>>  asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This should go in before the previous patch that adds the WARN for it.

Right, but than the long ops may not weird. Should I remove the ops and resend the whole patchset?

Which way is convenient for you?

Thanks
Alex



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux