On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 12:49 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 11:18 -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> > index e80aa9d2db68..334ce608735c 100644
> > --- a/mm/filemap.c
> > +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> > @@ -204,9 +204,9 @@ static void unaccount_page_cache_page(struct
> > address_space *mapping,
> > if (PageSwapBacked(page)) {
> > __mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM, -nr);
> > if (PageTransHuge(page))
> > - __dec_node_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM_THPS);
> > + __dec_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM_THPS);
> > } else if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> > - __dec_node_page_state(page, NR_FILE_THPS);
> > + __dec_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_FILE_THPS);
> > filemap_nr_thps_dec(mapping);
> > }
>
> This may be a dumb question, but does that mean the
> NR_FILE_THPS number will no longer be visible in
> /proc/vmstat or is there some magic I overlooked in
> a cursory look of the code?
Never mind, I found it a few levels deep in
__dec_lruvec_page_state.
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
All Rights Reversed.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
