On Fri 09-10-20 09:51:04, Miaohe Lin wrote: > The mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess check is exactly the > else case of mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess. So we could > replace else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess) with else > equally. > > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> I believe this is a result of a very unreadable code. Resp. the comment makes it hard to follow. It would be slightly better to simply drop the comment which doesn't really explain much IMHO. > --- > mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index 2636f8bad908..f607afd0fcbf 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz, > * We can't avoid mem cgroups that are over their soft > * limit by the same amount > */ > - else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess) > + else > p = &(*p)->rb_right; > } > > -- > 2.19.1 -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
