Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed 16-09-20 09:19:27, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> Since commit fb2a6fc56be6 ("mm: memcg: rework and document OOM waiting
>> and wakeup"), we have renamed mem_cgroup_oom_lock to
>> mem_cgroup_oom_trylock. So replace mem_cgroup_oom_lock with mem_cgroup_oom_trylock in comment.
>
>While you are right I find the comment more confusing then helpful.
>What does it try to tell us actually? Is it still valid? Shouldn't we rather remove it or make it more clear?
>>
It seems this comment no long make sense. Many thanks for your nice advise.
