Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] memcg: Enable fine-grained control of over memory.high action

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Astractly, I think this really overcomplicates the API a lot. If these are truly generally useful (and I think that remains to be demonstrated), they should be additions to the existing API, rather than a sidestep with prctl.

I also worry about some other more concrete things:

1. Doesn't this allow unprivileged applications to potentially bypass memory.high constraints set by a system administrator?
2. What's the purpose of PR_MEMACT_KILL, compared to memory.max?
3. Why add this entirely separate signal delivery path when we already have eventfd/poll/inotify support, which makes a lot more sense for modern applications?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux